Tag Archives: Retribution

09Apr/26

TACO” (Trump Always Chickens Out) trade theory

Greedflation and the Global Market: How Empty Ultimatums are Costing the Consumer

April 9, 2026 /Mpelembe Media/ —  The analysis explores the geopolitical and economic volatility surrounding the 2025–2026 trade policies of the Trump administration, specifically focusing on the “Taco trade” theory. This investment strategy, standing for “Trump Always Chickens Out,” suggests that markets often rally following aggressive tariff threats because traders anticipate a subsequent retreat or moderation. While some financial analysts view these maneuvers as negotiating tactics, macroeconomic reports warn of a “tax on certainty” that drives inflation and disrupts global supply chains. The texts also detail specific international frictions, such as 100% tariffs on Chinese goods and military tensions with Iran, which impact energy prices and strategic mineral control. Additionally, regional reactions are captured through public discourse in Louisiana regarding political monuments and legislative priorities. Collectively, the sources examine how authoritarian populism and executive discretion have transformed the global trade landscape into a transactional, high-stakes environment.

Continue reading

28Jan/26

Silicon Valley Breaks “Coziness” With Trump Admin as Tech Leaders Denounce ICE Over Shooting

Jan. 28, 2026 /Mpelembe Media/ — There is a growing rift between Silicon Valley executives and the Trump administration following a violent incident involving federal agents. High-profile figures in the tech industry have begun voicing harsh public criticisms of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, specifically citing a lack of humanity in the agency’s recent operations. These condemnations mark a significant shift away from the industry’s previous attempts to maintain a cooperative relationship with the federal government. By speaking out, these leaders are knowingly inviting the risk of executive retaliation or political backlash. Ultimately, the piece highlights how moral concerns over immigration tactics are currently outweighing the strategic benefits of remaining silent. Continue reading